Everyone says your idea is great, but the market might not.
Paste your idea and Draftable researches your real competitors, sizes the actual market, and hands you a cited go-or-kill verdict in minutes.
Flat $5 per report · no subscription · results in just a few minutes
Real mandatory market, but incumbent is walking into your white space
CONDITIONAL GO. BPS compliance is a genuine, expanding, mandatory regulatory market, but two facts gate it: ~89% of NYC buildings already comply for 2024-2029, so the fine-driven urgency is deferred to 2030, and Measurabl (~$170M funded) just launched a free perpetual tracking tier plus a paid product that already auto-tags municipal/state regulations. The white space (automated cross-jurisdiction system of record with fine forecasting, filing generation, and retrofit financing) is real and defensible if you move before the incumbent generalizes into it.
Mandatory, expanding regulatory tailwind (13+ cities, growing), but modest ~$160M SAM and ~89% current compliance defer acute fine-driven willingness to pay to 2030.
FLIPS IF · Pass if 2030 exposure pulls demand forward materially or covered-jurisdiction count/coverage expands sharply.
Real white space (automated cross-jurisdiction filing + forecast + financing) with a credible moat path, but a well-funded incumbent (Measurabl) is visibly moving toward it via free tier and reg-tagging.
FLIPS IF · Fail if Measurabl ships fine-forecast + filing automation in its free/standard tier; pass if you lock the filing-of-record and financing moat first.
High ACV and mandatory annual renewal support LTV:CAC ≥3:1 and strong retention, but long CRE sales cycles raise payback and the free-tracking floor pressures price.
FLIPS IF · Pass with evidence of sub-12-month payback and >110% net revenue retention; fail if priced head-to-head with free tracking and no decisioning premium.
Adjacent paid willingness to pay is proven (Measurabl Navigate, Audette, consultants billing per building per year) and a cheap painted-door pre-sale to 2030-exposed NYC portfolios is obvious.
FLIPS IF · Fail only if repeated pre-sale attempts to exposed owners yield no paid pilot commitments.
Realistically you can reach low single-digit millions in yearly recurring revenue within three years, which supports a solid capital-efficient business but not a giant one unless the retrofit-financing cut grows.
SHOWN MATH · NYC ~50,000 covered buildings; ~150,000-250,000 nationally across NYC/Boston/DC/Denver/Seattle/WA/CO/MD. Addressable (inside 10+ building portfolios) ~40% → ~80,000 buildings. × ~$2,000/building = ~$160M SAM. SOM at 1-3% = ~$1.6M-$4.8M ARR. Financing take-rate is variable upside on top.
- ~40% of covered buildings sit in portfolios large enough to buy portfolio SaaS
- ~$2,000/building/year midpoint price
- Financing take-rate excluded from core SAM (treated as upside)
WHY NOW · NYC enforcement and first fines began in 2025, and the city/state patchwork is expanding fast (13+ cities, projected to grow), so cross-jurisdiction tooling is newly necessary.
CROSS-CHECK · Cross-real-estate ESG software TAM is larger, but the fine-compliance-only slice is the right narrow frame; the bottom-up ~$160M SAM is intentionally conservative versus broad ESG spend.
Dominant real-estate ESG data platform; free perpetual tier plus paid Navigate that auto-tags municipal/state regs
Broad ESG/investor reporting, not a purpose-built fine-forecast + filing-generation compliance agent
Free EPA platform that all US benchmarking/BPS filings run on
Raw manual data entry, no fine forecasting, retrofit ranking, or multi-jurisdiction automation
Decarbonization/retrofit modeling; stack-ranks assets by IRR using building simulations
Retrofit decisioning only; not the mandatory annual filing system of record
Smart building OS with real-time meter/BMS LL97 emissions monitoring and alerts
Hardware/BMS-heavy; over-serves owners who just need annual mandatory filings
Utility data automation, energy modeling, ROI projection for BPS planning
Planning/modeling focus, not integrated filing generation or financing
The status quo: per-building per-year human compliance and retrofit-planning services
Expensive, manual, not scalable software; no portfolio system of record
MARKET STRUCTURE · Fragmented today: a free government layer (ESPM/BEAM), a consolidating ESG-data leader (Measurabl), point retrofit/modeling tools (Audette, nZero), building-OS players (KODE), and manual consultants, but no one owns an automated cross-jurisdiction compliance-and-filing system of record.
LTV:CAC. For every dollar you spend landing a portfolio owner you can expect to make several back over the life of the account, which is healthy enough to justify a sales team.
~4:1 (estimated) · Clears the 3:1 B2B floor; below the 5:1 target until sales motion is proven
CAC payback. It takes roughly a year or more to earn back what you spend winning each customer, so you need patient capital and should push to shorten sales cycles.
~12-18 months (estimated) · At or slightly past the ~12mo comfort line due to long CRE sales cycles
Gross margin. Most of every dollar of revenue is profit after running costs, because the AI work happens at filing time rather than constantly.
~75-85% · In the healthy SaaS band; AI inference is periodic, not a major drag
Net revenue retention. Because the filings are legally required every year and you can add buildings and a financing cut, existing customers should spend more over time rather than churning.
>110% (target) · Strong if achieved; underpinned by mandatory annual renewal and building/financing expansion
The free tracking tier from Measurabl/ESPM compresses the price floor; the per-building price only survives if the fine-forecast, filing-automation, and financing layers carry the value.
FIX · Never sell tracking; lead with fine forecasting, filing automation, and financing that free tools do not offer
FIX · Target the ~11% over-cap now plus 2030-exposed early movers; sell mandatory-filing convenience as the always-on hook
FIX · Move fast to lock filing-of-record workflow and financing moat before they generalize
FIX · Partner with RDP firms as their tooling layer; position as accelerator, not replacement
FIX · Diversify across jurisdictions and anchor value in the mandatory annual filing that persists
Mid-size NYC portfolio owners (30-100 buildings) with assets already over their cap or facing steep 2030 exposure under LL97.
Own the mandatory annual LL97 filing with automated fine-exposure forecasting, then expand to Boston/Denver/Seattle/WA in the same portfolio.
An automated, cross-jurisdiction compliance system of record that forecasts fines, generates filings, ranks retrofit payback, and attaches financing, no incumbent offers this as one integrated product.
Workflow lock-in via ownership of the mandatory annual filings plus a compounding proprietary dataset of retrofit-cost-versus-savings outcomes; a feature alone is not a moat, the filing-of-record plus financing attach is.
You would be the only tool that not only tells an owner what they owe across every city but actually files it and lines up the money to fix it.
General-purpose ESG/investor/GRESB reporting modules that Measurabl over-builds
Real-time BMS/5-minute interval hardware integration that KODE/Bueno over-serve; ingest utility-bill-level data instead
Cross-jurisdiction coverage and per-year fine-exposure forecasting accuracy far above the norm
An AI agent that auto-generates mandatory filings, ranks retrofit paths by payback, and connects to financing as one system of record
Per-building per-year ($1,200-3,000) anchored to fine exposure avoided, plus a take-rate on facilitated retrofit financing; never price the tracking layer against free.
Sales-led at ~$100K ACV: direct outreach to portfolio owners and property managers, plus RDP/consultant channel partnerships.
Painted-door pre-sale to 5-10 NYC portfolio owners with 2030-exposed assets: pitch the fine-forecast + filing automation and ask for a paid pilot commitment before building.
Why not just paste it into ChatGPT?
Honestly? ChatGPT and Claude are good at thinking about markets. Draftable runs that same intelligence through a rigorous, grounded, repeatable process, and commits to an answer you can act on.
One deep, adversarial analysis.
A single deep pass researches the live web, scores your idea against the way real markets actually work, and commits to a verdict. Three things make it rigorous:
Adversarial, not agreeable
It's instructed to hunt the free or bundled incumbent that zeroes your pricing, the crowded market, the broken unit economics. It will tell you NO-GO. A chat turn is built to encourage you.
Receipts, not vibes
Every competitor, price, and number is grounded in live web search with real sources: pricing pages, G2 and Capterra cons, Crunchbase, filings. Not un-cited prose a model half-remembered.
A committed, graded call
A GO / CONDITIONAL / NO-GO verdict from a deterministic four-gate matrix, with a 0–100 score and the exact thresholds that would flip it. No hedging, no 'it depends'.
Built for builders, not marketers.
The report uses real market terms because that rigor is the whole edge over a vague chat answer. Every one comes with a plain-English line built in, so a solo developer can read the whole thing with no marketing background. A few you’ll see:
Real reports you can read end to end.
I built Draftable after watching my own idea fail for reasons I should have seen coming. I spent months on a social media growth assistant for X before I realized it would break the platform's scraping rules, and that plenty of competitors had already shipped the same thing. The lesson stuck. Know the market before you write a line of code. When the market and the idea hold up, you can shape the product to fit them. When they don't, nothing else saves you. Market over everything.
The report is built on real market math and marketing rigor, every number cited to a reputable source. That depth is the whole point, and it should not take an MBA to read. I write it for solo developers like me: the honest verdict, in plain language, with the receipts to back it.
There is no shortage of idea validators. The edge here is the work behind each report. Tested on real samples, sharpened over many prompt iterations, and grounded in research I did by hand. I keep each report cheap on purpose, so any indie developer can afford the truth, at the highest quality I can produce, in a few minutes.
One report. One flat price.
No subscription, no caps, no upsell. A flat one-time $5 per report. Buy one only when you have an idea worth the truth.
One deep, web-grounded market verdict. No subscription, no caps. Pay once, only when you have an idea worth the truth.